Cancer would be much rarer if smoking didn't exist?

Education & Reference by Anonymous 2018-07-05 07:45:37

Social Science

12 answers

Anonymous

yes. good for you.
Anonymous

You betcha if they would only banned Smoking and Fresca most people would never get cancer
Anonymous

Not really. That's why you can't produce any stats to back up that childish assumption. Smoking isn't the only thing that has a risk of causing cancer.
Anonymous

No. Only 20% of cancers are lung cancer.
Anonymous

That is a true statement. What is your question?
Anonymous

Not rarer, just less cases of it.
Anonymous

Smoking certainly leads to the risk of many cancers, but it does not mean that only smoking can cause cancer.
Anonymous

Are you genuinely asking would there be less cancer if a thing that caused a great amount of cancer didn't exist....? I mean, maybe you should take this question down to hide this silly mistake.
Anonymous

No. There re still all those exhaust fumes from vehicles and plants and all those cancerogenes in food
Anonymous

I don't think so. There are lots of other factors in play that can cause cancer.
Anonymous

Lung Cancer would be rarer but there are still other types of cancer still contagious and spreading faster each day due to our industrialized ecosystem.
Anonymous

Why ask? We already know that is the case.